|
STATEMENT BY
PRESIDENT
KABBAH AT THE FORMAL LAUNCHING
OF THE NATIONAL ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGY
ON TUESDAY 15TH FEBRUARY 2005
As you will recall, in December of last
year, in this same facility, we met to observe the 1st
Anniversary of the International Anti-Corruption Day and also celebrate
the publication of the preliminary draft of our National Anti-Corruption
Strategy.
The development of the National
Anti-Corruption Strategy (NACS) is a vital component of a comprehensive
national programme to combat corruption. Since the promulgation of the
Anti-Corruption Act in February 2000, and thereafter, the establishment
of the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC), crafting of this important
policy document was held up by unforeseen delays. This set back,
however, is now a thing of the past as we gather here today to establish
yet another significant milestone in our commitment to tackle the
scourge of corruption.
The launching of the National
Anti-Corruption Strategy (NACS) is therefore a further demonstration of
my government’s commitment to Good Governance, institutional Reform and
the eradication of corruption in Sierra Leone.
The importance of a National
Anti-Corruption Strategy (NACS) to help curb corruption in Sierra Leone
cannot be over emphasized. A National Anti-Corruption Strategy (NACS)
is a vital prerequisite in that it embodies strategic action plans that
have been developed in consultation with a cross section of society and
stakeholders in Freetown and Regional capitals in the country. This
process culminated in the National Consultative Group Meeting held in
Freetown on 2nd & 3rd February 2005, whose main
objective was to increase public participation in the review and
finalization of the draft National Anti-Corruption Strategy (NACS)
presented to the Government of Sierra Leone on December 10th
2004. This goal was accomplished by drawing on the experiences and views
of all facets of society. In addition, the Consultative Meeting
addressed the issue of corruption in the country and assessed various
strategies for its eradication. As part of this dialogue, participants
were encouraged to comment and provide input on specific sections of the
Strategy.
Participants were also invited to:
Ø
Discuss attitudes towards, and
the causes and costs of corruption in Sierra Leone
Ø
Identify the most urgent areas
that require reform
Ø
Discuss specific measures to be
included in a viable National Anti-Corruption Strategy
Ø
Establish ownership of and
commitment to the National Anti-Corruption Strategy
An integral part of this process was
the Integrity Retreat attended by all Cabinet Ministers with
responsibility for the areas requiring urgent reforms. The Retreat,
during which plans for implementation were further discussed, also
provided an opportunity for a final consultation with the ACC on the
strategy and to further discuss the issue of implementation. I was made
to understand by the Vice-President that this high level meeting was
very productive.
The outcome of the various processes
outlined above, has provided us with the requisite tools to translate
our commitment to tackle corruption into a sustainable action
programme.
An equally important factor is the
quality of information that is available to aid in establishing the key
priority areas for concerted action. Because corruption is a symptom of
inefficient institutions and poor policies, it has often proven
difficult to assess where reforms are most needed. This experience has
taught us that there is a need for diagnostic studies to be undertaken,
as was the case with the Governance and Corruption Survey in 2003, in
order to better understand the shortcomings of policy formulation and
the capacity of state institutions to manage policies.
Another crucial factor I must make bold
to say is political leadership. Any and every successful
Anti-Corruption effort must have the full backing of political
leadership, which my Government is committed to providing.
Experience has also led me to realize
that fighting corruption has distributional consequences, which can
mobilize powerful forces to protect vested interests at any cost. It is
for this reason that I will continue to give my full support to the work
of the ACC. I as President of the Republic of Sierra Leone, expect the
same level of political commitment from all my Ministers and the
people’s representatives in Parliament.
A third, and perhaps the most
important, element in this process rests squarely with you my
compatriots. The formulation of the National Anti-Corruption Strategy (NACS)
has greatly benefited from the participation of the public. The
challenge we now face is managing the implementation of the Strategy.
Are we going to consign this document to our shelves and cupboards to
gather dust? Or are we going to take up the challenge and make it
work?
Collective action is vital at this
stage. The active participation of civil society, the private sector,
grassroot organizations, our young people and youth and the broad array
of government officials both at central core and on the local level must
complement our political commitment towards the eradication of
corruption. This political will and commitment was what was lacking
before our time.
I now wish to take this opportunity to
express some views as to how, with the requisite political commitment as
stated here, the Anti-Corruption Commission on its part can make the
desired success and become an instrument serving the good of this
country and commanding the respect of all well-meaning Sierra Leoneans.
Firstly there is the need for the
Commission to ensure that its integrity is maintained at all times.
- There should
not be an alarmist approach to its assignment. Therefore before the
Commission goes to the media to announce the discovery of a case of
corruption, there should already be ample evidence to support that
announcement. Raising an alarm without producing the result expected to
flow from the alarm will not enhance the integrity of the Commission,
and it will only provide a recipe for rumour-mongers and detractors.
- Efforts should
be made to ensure that the
number of cases lost in
court or dismissed for lack of sufficient evidence is reduced. The more
cases that are lost in court, so the integrity of the Commission will be
reduced. Therefore every effort should be made to ensure that every
allegation of corruption is supported by provable evidential material
before it is taken to court. Hence, the need to develop a productive
working relationship with the office of the Attorney-General.
-
It is most
important that the Commission should avoid creating inadvertently or
otherwise, any impression or perception of any witch-hunting of
individuals or class of individuals. For example, press statement by
the Anti-Corruption Commission treating as a fact false media
speculations or rumours that the American Government had banned a number
of Government Ministers from entering the United States because of their
involvement in corruption; an announcement by the Anti-Corruption
Commission that it was investigating six Ministers whose names and the
subject matter of the investigation not given – such press statements
may give the impression that the Ministers as a class are being targeted
by the Anti-Corruption Commission, which certainly cannot be correct.
This tends to undermine the integrity of the Government as a whole and
it further tends to adversely affect the moral authority of all the
Ministers of Government. In our present situation as a Government just
emerging from a war, with such a deprivation all around, corrupt public
officials should be exposed without mercy. That was the whole purpose I
had in mind for setting up the Anti-Corruption Commission in the first
place. By doing that, the Commission would have lived up to its
objectives to the pride of this nation. But at the same time a blanket
allegation of corruption levied against Government Ministers without
more may be a potential case for disquiet and even the instability of
the State. This will be disastrous for the entire nation, as it will be
the easiest way of provoking without justification public reaction and
disaffection for the Government. I have also started experiencing
another fear namely, that some highly competent and honest people whom I
know could make a pivotal contribution to the development of this
country are shying away from State appointments for fear of being
accused of corruption or of belonging to a Government comprising of a
bunch of corrupt Ministers. I fear this perception sticking. This is a
trend, which I hope would not continue as it will create an unfortunate
situation for the future of this country.
-
To maintain its
integrity, it is most important for the Commission to appear to be very
fair always.
a)
It is not, for
example, fair for the Commission to first allege publicly that an
individual has been involved in corrupt practice and then take a long
time to investigate and conclude that investigation. It is fairer for
the ACC to have ample evidence in its possession before publicly
alleging the commission by an individual of an offence of corruption.
b)
If a person is
alleged by the Anti-Corruption Commission to be involved in corrupt
practices, and it turns out that the evidence gathered by the Commission
does not support the allegation, the ACC should come out in fairness to
the person accused, with a public statement and say so.
c)
Inordinate delays
between the commencement of some investigations and the conclusion of
those investigation should be avoided
The eyes of the world are
now focused on Sierra Leone following our historic achievement of
peace. We must now strive to consolidate the peace by reclaiming lost
opportunities for long-term progress. I therefore admonish you all to
join me in a collective effort to confront and end corruption in our
country. The lament that the effects of civil strife continue to impede
progress is now wearing thin. We must be forward looking and take up
the fight to promote good governance, institutional reform and
elimination of corruption.
It is with great pride and
pleasure that I formally launch the National Anti-Corruption Strategy (NACS).
|